On Thu, 11 Mar 2010, Robin Whittle wrote:
Didn't anyone else think the second question was ambiguous,
nonsensical or whatever?  What did people think they were agreeing or
disagreeing with by answering Yes or No to the second question?

FWIW, yes, it certainly was ambiguous, but it was apparent that lots of folks interpreted it their own way. You made good points about different interpretations in your previous post. In the end, it is not critical to know why folks made the assumptions and interpretations they did. However, in order to build consensus, it would not hurt to have more precise questions but this is not an absolute requirement, and as Ran wrote, this seemed like an intentional approach.

Pekka Savola                 "You each name yourselves king, yet the
Netcore Oy                    kingdom bleeds."
Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings
rrg mailing list

Reply via email to