> OK. So I will see the intention of this straw poll more relaxed: You just > wanted to keep the ball rolling :-) No. Let me say it again: this poll grew out of a desire from some folks to ensure that we recorded an explicit consensus of the WG on certain points. It is my intention to record any and all of the points that have a clear consensus in the recommendation document. This will be done verbatim, without tons of explanatory text. Thus, the statements need to be clear independently. Tony _______________________________________________ rrg mailing list [email protected] http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg
- Re: [rrg] Another Routing RG Straw Poll Dae Young KIM
- Re: [rrg] Another Routing RG Straw Poll Paul Jakma
- Re: [rrg] Another Routing RG Straw Poll RJ Atkinson
- Re: [rrg] Another Routing RG Straw Poll heinerhummel
- Re: [rrg] Another Routing RG Straw Poll Fred Baker
- Re: [rrg] Another Routing RG Straw Poll HeinerHummel
- Re: [rrg] Another Routing RG Straw Poll HeinerHummel
- Re: [rrg] Another Routing RG Straw Poll RJ Atkinson
- Re: [rrg] Another Routing RG Straw Poll heinerhummel
- Re: [rrg] Another Routing RG Straw Poll Tony Li
- Re: [rrg] Another Routing RG Straw Poll Marshall Eubanks
- Re: [rrg] Another Routing RG Straw Poll heinerhummel
- Re: [rrg] Another Routing RG Straw Poll Marshall Eubanks
- Re: [rrg] Another Routing RG Straw Poll Noel Chiappa
- Re: [rrg] Another Routing RG Straw Poll Noel Chiappa
- Re: [rrg] Another Routing RG Straw Poll Dae Young KIM
- Re: [rrg] Another Routing RG Straw Poll Noel Chiappa
- Re: [rrg] Another Routing RG Straw Poll Dae Young KIM
- Re: [rrg] Another Routing RG Straw Poll Joel M. Halpern
