NB: I said yes. That doesn't mean I think the identity split must be in the 
routing architecture though. ;) 
 
regards, 
-- Paul Jakma [email protected] 
So did I although I  not only criticize the current architectural path as by
1)     "The Internet continuing down the current architectural path,
    whereby site multi-homing increases the size/entropy of         
    the DFZ RIB/FIB, is not believed to be scalable or viable."

but also the clinging to this school of thought (DV, the prefix building bliss, 
the NSAP/ICD/DCC/etc-hierarchical view from 20 years ago,...) which caused the 
problem
and which won't get us any further. 



...address the real-world constraints of the 
    end customers (large and small)
Is "Enforcing to have an non-mobile home-agent" instead of "potentially 
enabling ALL users to be mobile" such a real-world constraint of the end 
customer
(large and small) ?


Heiner



Heiner





-----Ursprüngliche Mitteilung----- 
Von: Paul Jakma <[email protected]>
An: RJ Atkinson <[email protected]>
Cc: IRTF Routing RG <[email protected]>
Verschickt: Di., 18. Mai. 2010, 15:47
Thema: Re: [rrg] Another Routing RG Straw Poll


On Mon, 17 May 2010, RJ Atkinson wrote: 
 
> I will NOT be modifying the statement wording during this poll. 
 
> (2)   "The RG has rough consensus that separating identity from 
>   location is desirable and technically feasible.  However, 
>   the RG does NOT have consensus on the best engineering 
>   approach to such an identity/location split." 
 
Are people being invited to agree/disagree on underlying technical question, or 
the social question of whether they believe the RRG has consensus on this? (I 
presume you intended on the technical). 
 
NB: I said yes. That doesn't mean I think the identity split must be in the 
routing architecture though. ;) 
 
regards, 
-- Paul Jakma  [email protected]  Key ID: 64A2FF6A 
Fortune: 
You look tired. 
_______________________________________________ 
rrg mailing list 
[email protected] 
http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg 

 
_______________________________________________
rrg mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg

Reply via email to