>>> (2) "The RG has rough consensus that separating identity from >>> location is desirable and technically feasible. However, >>> the RG does NOT have consensus on the best engineering >>> approach to such an identity/location split." >> >> Are people being invited to agree/disagree on underlying technical question, >> or the social question of whether they believe the RRG has consensus on this? >> (I presume you intended on the technical). > > The technical question. Even more specifically, if there is a consensus of agreement, then the statement will be included verbatim in our recommendation document as a point of RG consensus. Tony _______________________________________________ rrg mailing list [email protected] http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg
- Re: [rrg] Another Routing RG Straw Poll Scott Brim
- [rrg] question 2, RE: Another Routing RG Straw Poll Ross Callon
- Re: [rrg] question 2, RE: Another Routing RG St... Shane Amante
- Re: [rrg] question 2, RE: Another Routing R... Ross Callon
- Re: [rrg] Another Routing RG Straw Poll Eliot Lear
- Re: [rrg] Another Routing RG Straw Poll heinerhummel
- Re: [rrg] Another Routing RG Straw Poll Toni Stoev
- Re: [rrg] Another Routing RG Straw Poll Dae Young KIM
- Re: [rrg] Another Routing RG Straw Poll Paul Jakma
- Re: [rrg] Another Routing RG Straw Poll RJ Atkinson
- Re: [rrg] Another Routing RG Straw Poll Tony Li
- Re: [rrg] Another Routing RG Straw Poll heinerhummel
- Re: [rrg] Another Routing RG Straw Poll Fred Baker
- Re: [rrg] Another Routing RG Straw Poll HeinerHummel
- Re: [rrg] Another Routing RG Straw Poll HeinerHummel
- Re: [rrg] Another Routing RG Straw Poll RJ Atkinson
- Re: [rrg] Another Routing RG Straw Poll heinerhummel
- Re: [rrg] Another Routing RG Straw Poll Tony Li
- Re: [rrg] Another Routing RG Straw Poll Marshall Eubanks
- Re: [rrg] Another Routing RG Straw Poll heinerhummel
