> On 23 May 2026, at 09:07, Brian E Carpenter <[email protected]> > wrote: > > On 23-May-26 01:23, Salz, Rich wrote: >> * >> I'd say "most streams will mostly follow the default". >> There is at least one place where there is no default: >> 10. Dispute> Disputes about authorship, editorship, contributors and >> acknowledgements will not be settled by the RPC and must be resolved >> by the relevant RFC stream according to its own procedures. > > True, and I really think we shouldn't burden the RPC with that sort of issue.
How do you propose disputes are handled regarding RFCs published before streams were introduced? Jay > > Brian > -- > rswg mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] -- Jay Daley IETF Executive Director [email protected] -- rswg mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
