Hi,

I have read the draft and also support adoption.    I think it is useful to 
have this written down, and expect it to change after adoption (as it normal).  
  While each Steam will be able to override specific items, I suspect that will 
be fairly limited.

Bob


> On May 20, 2026, at 2:11 AM, Eliot Lear <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Signed PGP part
> I'm in favor of adoption of this draft.�A I do�Anot�Abelieve there is that 
> much intended variation between the streams, and someone would really have to 
> show me that this is the case.�A�AI have no problem with streams overriding 
> certain provisions on a case-by-case basis.�A�AAnd to John's point, I don't 
> recall where we actually took this on as work, either here or in the IETF, 
> and failed. Mostly what Brian is doing is consolidating the RFC Editor and 
> IETF statements.�A I agree with nearly all of EKR's specific points, one of 
> which aligns with what Colin wrote, but all of those points could be fixed.
> 
> Eliot
> 
> 
> 
> On 20.05.2026 00:38, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
>> So, I haven't seen any comments.
>> 
>> Either that means everybody is 100% happy with the draft and we should adopt 
>> it immediately, or nobody is interested and we should just drop it. Which is 
>> it to be?
>> 
>> Regards/Ng� mihi
>> �A�A Brian
>> 
>> On 23-Apr-26 17:04, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
>>> Heavily updated following many comments...
>>> 
>>> The main points were to make it clear that stream policies always win, and 
>>> I added a minimal section on dispute resolution.
>>> 
>>> More comments please!
>>> 
>>> �A�A�A�A Brian
>>> 
>>> -------- Forwarded Message --------
>>> Subject: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-rswg-authoring-ethics-01.txt
>>> Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2026 21:55:26 -0700
>>> From: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>> Reply-To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>> To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>> 
>>> Internet-Draft draft-carpenter-rswg-authoring-ethics-01.txt is now 
>>> available.
>>> 
>>> �A�A�A�A Title:�A�A Ethical aspects of RFC authorship
>>> �A�A�A�A Author:�A Brian E. Carpenter
>>> �A�A�A�A Name:�A�A�A draft-carpenter-rswg-authoring-ethics-01.txt
>>> �A�A�A�A Pages:�A�A 11
>>> �A�A�A�A Dates:�A�A 2026-04-22
>>> 
>>> Abstract:
>>> 
>>> �A�A�A�A This document describes guidelines for assigning authorship in RFC
>>> �A�A�A�A documents, including guidelines for disclosing the use of 
>>> artificial
>>> �A�A�A�A intelligence during document preparation.�A It also discusses the
>>> �A�A�A�A related issues of acknowledgements, editors and contributors.�A The
>>> �A�A�A�A various RFC streams may set their own guidelines, which will have
>>> �A�A�A�A priority.
>>> 
>>> The IETF datatracker status page for this Internet-Draft is:
>>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-carpenter-rswg-authoring-ethics/
>>> 
>>> There is also an HTML version available at:
>>> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-carpenter-rswg-authoring-ethics-01.html
>>> 
>>> A diff from the previous version is available at:
>>> https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-carpenter-rswg-authoring-ethics-01
>>> 
>>> Internet-Drafts are also available by rsync at:
>>> rsync.ietf.org <http://rsync.ietf.org/>::internet-drafts
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> I-D-Announce mailing list -- [email protected] 
>>> <mailto:[email protected]>
>>> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] 
>>> <mailto:[email protected]>
> 
> ョフ 勣・岳%翰kウ+}ヌ搖レ+「ク「鴈ケサョ&゙ア鰡jwヲj)m「サ08埒�q軛カ願

-- 
rswg mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to