Hello everybody,
On 2026-05-22 05:26, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
On 22-May-26 03:05, Russ Housley wrote:
What does it mean to have a series-wide policy that includes this
statement?
The various RFC streams may set their own guidelines, which will
have priority.
Are we forcing each stream to make their own, or do we expect that
most streams will follow this default?
I'd say "most streams will mostly follow the default". I'd also reword
the statement, e.g. as follows:
The various RFC streams may define exceptions to / variations from these
guidelines, which will have priority.
My point is that we want the streams to just say where they differ, not
write everything up anew just for a minor change.
Regards, Martin.
My best answer to that question is "Yes".
I think there's an analogy to the IETF IPR rules, which the other
streams have largely adopted. But it's clear there may be variations,
for example around the acceptability of AI-generated text.
Anyway, given the variety of opinion about adoption here, I will have a
go at another version, some time in the next few weeks.
Brian
--
rswg mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
