I agree, again, with everything EKR wrote. If the goal is to be consistent across streams, adopting this document in the smallest and least important* of streams and saying that the other streams can modify and adopt this as they see fit is not the way to achieve that goal. Have the largest and most important* stream process it first.
*By least and most important, I am referring to the participation and readership size, as well as the impact on the industry. Nobody really cares how “x+y<z” is written in RFC source, nor should they; they care about things like the best way to use TLS, for example. Taking Eliot’s lens and thinking of the reader, this document does not belong here.
-- rswg mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
