On 24.06.2026 18:53, Salz, Rich wrote:
This draft is the first to address *content*, and it happens after the stream has handed the draft to the RPC. At that point, everyone is expecting that the only thing to deal with is what we think of as editorial issues that *do not change* the semantic content of the document. Yet another reason to take this so the IETF stream.
I agree that authorship could be considered a form of content, concepts surrounding authorship are nevertheless universal. Let's put this another way: could you really envision different streams having different policies? And if so, (here comes the broken record), what is the user to infer about authorship?
Eliot
OpenPGP_0x87B66B46D9D27A33.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- rswg mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
