Hi... On 24.06.2026 18:17, Eric Rescorla wrote:
I agree that we have minimal quality control for I-Ds when compared to RFCs. However, that doesn't mean it's appropriate to violate the applicable professional standards for giving credit in I-Ds. To take an example from another setting, it's very common for people to publish academic work on preprint servers which don't do much in the way of peer review. I don't think that means that plagiarism in preprints is acceptable.
Bad example. Preprints are very late in the process. Drafts stretch the gambit from chicken scratch to preprint quality. And while we might care about drafts, this group can't do much about them. THAT at least for the moment is left to the streams (principally the IETF). RFCs are not.
Eliiot
OpenPGP_0x87B66B46D9D27A33.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- rswg mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
