On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 3:10 PM, Boylan, James <[email protected]>wrote:
> I had a sneaking suspicion that would be the case. I might setup a system > running the Fedora version with this setup (Fedora 20 I think?) when its > available to do some tests on exactly how it is implemented and what > possible options exist. That should help me be a bit ahead of the game for > when it finally makes it's way into CentOS. > > Oh, that would be great. I admit I was so busy the past month that I didn't even bother to try this. As a side-note, I have some replacement library work lying around that can be preloaded and redirects logging traffic to a diffrent socket. It's hackish, but may be needed in high performance environments. In any case, please keep us updated -- maybe we can craft some of the new packages based on your findings. I really think we need two sets of standard things: one for the low end, where folks are happy with the journal and just would like to get e.g. router messages into it .... and one for real logging... IMHO both are valid use cases. Rainer _______________________________________________ rsyslog mailing list http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/ What's up with rsyslog? Follow https://twitter.com/rgerhards NOTE WELL: This is a PUBLIC mailing list, posts are ARCHIVED by a myriad of sites beyond our control. PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE and DO NOT POST if you DON'T LIKE THAT.
