Jesse Vincent wrote:
And this behavior definitivly changed from 3.4.1 to 3.6.{3,4}.
FWIW, yes. we did do a _lot_ of work on references and in-reply-to
between 3.4.1 and 3.6. But most of it was to get _more correct_ header
info.
Looking at a random message coming off of our 3.6.3+devel instance, I
see this:
In-Reply-To:
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-Id:
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Precedence: bulk
X-Rt-Loop-Prevention: bestpractical.com
And things thread just fine.
I just had a look at my mail file of Thunderbird and did a search for
'In-Reply-To: <rt-3.6.1' which turned up only one hit the first email so
I'll need to have a look at my old email archive to look back further. I
didn't get any hits for 'In-Reply-To: <rt-3.6.2', and had a lot of hits
for 'In-Reply-To: <rt-3.6.3', no hits yet for 'In-Reply-To: <rt-3.6.4'
May be this helps in finding when problems started.
Joop
_______________________________________________
http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-users
Community help: http://wiki.bestpractical.com
Commercial support: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Discover RT's hidden secrets with RT Essentials from O'Reilly Media.
Buy a copy at http://rtbook.bestpractical.com
