Dear authors and BFD WG, The IESG telechat of the 9th of January has reviewed [1] draft-ietf-bfd-large-packets-14 and decided that a revised I-D is required. The key issue is about the padding, both in the YANG leaf (per Mahesh’s comment) and in the section 3 about the expected “receiver” behavior (i.e., check or ignore that the optional padding is full of 0, if no check, then mention a potential covert channel in the security section).
This should be an easy update for a revised I-D :-) Regards -éric PS: please note that I will be on holidays from 17th of January until the end of the month, so a revised I-D should be submitted before ;-) [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bfd-large-packets/ballot/
