On Wed, Jan 15, 2025 at 10:40:32AM +0530, Mahesh Jethanandani wrote: > > On Jan 15, 2025, at 12:23 AM, John Scudder <[email protected]> wrote: > > AFAICT from trying to unpack this conversation, yes that is your request, > > yes the IESG has approved documents with that citation style, yes Jeff > > should go ahead and do that. Please yell if that’s not right. > > That was my suspicion too, but I did not think of checking the RFC Editor > queue for an example. Thanks for confirming.
Draft -16 has been published using the new boilerplate. In response to the guidance from 8407-bis I have changed a number of previously normative references to informative. I have also corrected the single node name defined in the YANG module to "pdu-size" where used in the draft text. It was previously the typedef name "padded-pdu-size", which was not the node name. I believe this resolves all outstanding requests from the IESG that required action. -- Jeff
