John, On Tue, Jan 14, 2025 at 06:53:06PM +0000, John Scudder wrote: > Hi Mahesh, > > (And hoping not to tread on Éric’s toes here…)
[...] > I think you mean “references the draft” not RFCAAAA. Let’s take a look at > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ccamp-otn-topo-yang/ since that > recently passed IESG review and therefore is presumably “good enough”. I > guess your suggestion that the present draft should emulate that one in terms > of its citation style. For convenience, here’s what that one has: > > “This section is modeled after the template described in Section 3.7 of > [I-D.ietf-netmod-rfc8407bis<https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-ccamp-otn-topo-yang-20.html#I-D.ietf-netmod-rfc8407bis>].” > > In other words, what Jeff said: > > If your request is "go ahead and replace RFCAAAA with the current version of > the draft text and cite it informationally, but otherwise use that format" - > I can do so. > > AFAICT from trying to unpack this conversation, yes that is your request, yes > the IESG has approved documents with that citation style, yes Jeff should go > ahead and do that. Please yell if that’s not right. Thanks for confirming this style works. I'll update the draft tomorrow matching the example and submit. -- Jeff
