As a co-author, I also support publication of both drafts. To the best of my knowledge, there is no IPR related to these drafts, other than those already disclosed.

Gabor

On 11/12/2015 03:45 PM, Chris Bowers wrote:

I support publication of both drafts, and am a co-author. I am not aware of IPR related to these drafts, other than that already disclosed.

Chris

*From:*Alvaro Retana (aretana) [mailto:[email protected]]
*Sent:* Thursday, November 12, 2015 8:28 AM
*To:* [email protected]
*Cc:* [email protected]; [email protected] *Subject:* Re: WGLC for draft-rtgwg-mrt-frr-architecture *and* draft-ietf-rtgwg-mrt-frr-algorithm

Fat fingered the name of one of the drafts.. :-(

In case it's not obvious, this WGLC is for draft-ietf-rtgwg-mrt-frr-architecture *and* draft-ietf-rtgwg-mrt-frr-algorithm.

Alvaro.

On 11/12/15, 9:22 AM, "rtgwg on behalf of Alvaro Retana (aretana)" <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> on behalf of [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    Hi!

    Because both WG Chairs and the Responsible AD are directly
    involved (as authors) in the MRT work, they have recused
    themselves and asked me to make the WGLC and corresponding
    consensus call.  Janos Farkas has agreed to be the Shepherd for
    both documents.  I will continue to be the Responsible AD for
    both.  [Note that Jeff is not listed as author/contributor on
    draft-ietf-rtgwg-mrt-frr-algorithm, but it only makes sense to
    process the 2 documents together.]

    This message starts a WGLC for draft-rtgwg-mrt-frr-architecture
    *and* draft-ietf-rtgwg-mrt-frr-algorithm.  This call will close by
    EOD (pick your favorite time zone) on November 30, 2015.  Please
    provide specific feedback as to why you support (or not) the
    advancement of these drafts.  Please avoid "+1"-type responses.

    https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-rtgwg-mrt-frr-architecture

    https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-rtgwg-mrt-frr-algorithm

    I want to formally ask the authors (no additional contributors are
    listed in the latest version of either document) to please respond
    to this message indicating whether or not you are aware of any
    relevant IPR, beyond what has already been disclosed.  The drafts
    will not progress (pending the results of the WGLC) until an
    explicit response from each author has been received.  Please be
    specific as to which draft you are referring to.

    Currently, only draft-ietf-rtgwg-mrt-frr-architecture has any
    disclosed IPR:

    
http://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/search/?submit=draft&id=draft-ietf-rtgwg-mrt-frr-architecture

    http://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/1594/

    http://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/1733/

    http://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/1801/

    If you are on the WG email list or attend WG meetings but are not
    listed as an author or contributor, please keep in mind your
    obligations under the IETF IPR rules which encourage you to notify
    the IETF if you are aware of IPR of others on an IETF
    contribution, or to refrain from participating in any contribution
    or discussion related to your undisclosed IPR.

    Thanks!

    Alvaro.


_______________________________________________
rtgwg mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg

Reply via email to