Support publication of both drafts.
In particular the approved (but currently held for publication) IEEE Std
802.1Qca depends on the description of the algorithm in the algorithm
draft and there is no suitable alternative (meeting the technical
requirements with the same or better maturity of description and
experience).
Mick Seaman
*From:*Alvaro Retana (aretana) [mailto:[email protected]]
*Sent:* Thursday, November 12, 2015 8:28 AM
*To:* [email protected]
*Cc:* [email protected];
[email protected]
*Subject:* Re: WGLC for draft-rtgwg-mrt-frr-architecture *and*
draft-ietf-rtgwg-mrt-frr-algorithm
Fat fingered the name of one of the drafts.. :-(
In case it's not obvious, this WGLC is
for draft-ietf-rtgwg-mrt-frr-architecture *and*
draft-ietf-rtgwg-mrt-frr-algorithm.
Alvaro.
On 11/12/15, 9:22 AM, "rtgwg on behalf of Alvaro Retana (aretana)"
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> on behalf of
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Hi!
Because both WG Chairs and the Responsible AD are directly involved
(as authors) in the MRT work, they have recused themselves and asked
me to make the WGLC and corresponding consensus call. Janos Farkas
has agreed to be the Shepherd for both documents. I will continue
to be the Responsible AD for both. [Note that Jeff is not listed as
author/contributor on draft-ietf-rtgwg-mrt-frr-algorithm, but it
only makes sense to process the 2 documents together.]
This message starts a WGLC for draft-rtgwg-mrt-frr-architecture
*and* draft-ietf-rtgwg-mrt-frr-algorithm. This call will close by
EOD (pick your favorite time zone) on November 30, 2015. Please
provide specific feedback as to why you support (or not) the
advancement of these drafts. Please avoid "+1"-type responses.
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-rtgwg-mrt-frr-architecture
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-rtgwg-mrt-frr-algorithm
I want to formally ask the authors (no additional contributors are
listed in the latest version of either document) to please respond
to this message indicating whether or not you are aware of any
relevant IPR, beyond what has already been disclosed. The drafts
will not progress (pending the results of the WGLC) until an
explicit response from each author has been received. Please be
specific as to which draft you are referring to.
Currently, only draft-ietf-rtgwg-mrt-frr-architecture has any
disclosed IPR:
http://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/search/?submit=draft&id=draft-ietf-rtgwg-mrt-frr-architecture
http://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/1594/
http://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/1733/
http://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/1801/
If you are on the WG email list or attend WG meetings but are not
listed as an author or contributor, please keep in mind your
obligations under the IETF IPR rules which encourage you to notify
the IETF if you are aware of IPR of others on an IETF contribution,
or to refrain from participating in any contribution or discussion
related to your undisclosed IPR.
Thanks!
Alvaro.
_______________________________________________
rtgwg mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
