Hi Alvaro, I too support publication of both drafts and am a co-author on the algorithm draft. I am not aware of any IPR related to these drafts, other than what has already been disclosed.
Thanks, Abishek On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 9:13 AM, Alia Atlas <[email protected]> wrote: > I also support publication of both drafts and am a co-author. I am not > aware of any IPR > related to these drafts, other than that already disclosed. > > Regards, > Alia > > On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 9:45 AM, Chris Bowers <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I support publication of both drafts, and am a co-author. I am not aware >> of IPR related to these drafts, other than that already disclosed. >> >> >> >> Chris >> >> >> >> >> >> *From:* Alvaro Retana (aretana) [mailto:[email protected]] >> *Sent:* Thursday, November 12, 2015 8:28 AM >> *To:* [email protected] >> *Cc:* [email protected]; >> [email protected] >> *Subject:* Re: WGLC for draft-rtgwg-mrt-frr-architecture *and* >> draft-ietf-rtgwg-mrt-frr-algorithm >> >> >> >> Fat fingered the name of one of the drafts.. :-( >> >> >> >> In case it's not obvious, this WGLC is >> for draft-ietf-rtgwg-mrt-frr-architecture *and* >> draft-ietf-rtgwg-mrt-frr-algorithm. >> >> >> >> Alvaro. >> >> >> >> On 11/12/15, 9:22 AM, "rtgwg on behalf of Alvaro Retana (aretana)" < >> [email protected] on behalf of [email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> >> Hi! >> >> >> >> Because both WG Chairs and the Responsible AD are directly involved (as >> authors) in the MRT work, they have recused themselves and asked me to make >> the WGLC and corresponding consensus call. Janos Farkas has agreed to be >> the Shepherd for both documents. I will continue to be the Responsible AD >> for both. [Note that Jeff is not listed as author/contributor on >> draft-ietf-rtgwg-mrt-frr-algorithm, but it only makes sense to process the >> 2 documents together.] >> >> >> >> This message starts a WGLC for draft-rtgwg-mrt-frr-architecture *and* >> draft-ietf-rtgwg-mrt-frr-algorithm. This call will close by EOD (pick your >> favorite time zone) on November 30, 2015. Please provide specific feedback >> as to why you support (or not) the advancement of these drafts. Please >> avoid "+1"-type responses. >> >> >> >> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-rtgwg-mrt-frr-architecture >> >> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-rtgwg-mrt-frr-algorithm >> >> >> >> >> >> I want to formally ask the authors (no additional contributors are listed >> in the latest version of either document) to please respond to this message >> indicating whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR, beyond what >> has already been disclosed. The drafts will not progress (pending the >> results of the WGLC) until an explicit response from each author has been >> received. Please be specific as to which draft you are referring to. >> >> >> >> Currently, only draft-ietf-rtgwg-mrt-frr-architecture has any disclosed >> IPR: >> >> >> >> >> http://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/search/?submit=draft&id=draft-ietf-rtgwg-mrt-frr-architecture >> >> http://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/1594/ >> >> http://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/1733/ >> >> http://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/1801/ >> >> >> >> If you are on the WG email list or attend WG meetings but are not listed >> as an author or contributor, please keep in mind your obligations under the >> IETF IPR rules which encourage you to notify the IETF if you are aware of >> IPR of others on an IETF contribution, or to refrain from participating in >> any contribution or discussion related to your undisclosed IPR. >> >> >> >> Thanks! >> >> >> >> Alvaro. >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> rtgwg mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg >> >> >
_______________________________________________ rtgwg mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
