I also support publication of both drafts and am a co-author. I am not aware of any IPR related to these drafts, other than that already disclosed.
Regards, Alia On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 9:45 AM, Chris Bowers <[email protected]> wrote: > I support publication of both drafts, and am a co-author. I am not aware > of IPR related to these drafts, other than that already disclosed. > > > > Chris > > > > > > *From:* Alvaro Retana (aretana) [mailto:[email protected]] > *Sent:* Thursday, November 12, 2015 8:28 AM > *To:* [email protected] > *Cc:* [email protected]; > [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: WGLC for draft-rtgwg-mrt-frr-architecture *and* > draft-ietf-rtgwg-mrt-frr-algorithm > > > > Fat fingered the name of one of the drafts.. :-( > > > > In case it's not obvious, this WGLC is > for draft-ietf-rtgwg-mrt-frr-architecture *and* > draft-ietf-rtgwg-mrt-frr-algorithm. > > > > Alvaro. > > > > On 11/12/15, 9:22 AM, "rtgwg on behalf of Alvaro Retana (aretana)" < > [email protected] on behalf of [email protected]> wrote: > > > > Hi! > > > > Because both WG Chairs and the Responsible AD are directly involved (as > authors) in the MRT work, they have recused themselves and asked me to make > the WGLC and corresponding consensus call. Janos Farkas has agreed to be > the Shepherd for both documents. I will continue to be the Responsible AD > for both. [Note that Jeff is not listed as author/contributor on > draft-ietf-rtgwg-mrt-frr-algorithm, but it only makes sense to process the > 2 documents together.] > > > > This message starts a WGLC for draft-rtgwg-mrt-frr-architecture *and* > draft-ietf-rtgwg-mrt-frr-algorithm. This call will close by EOD (pick your > favorite time zone) on November 30, 2015. Please provide specific feedback > as to why you support (or not) the advancement of these drafts. Please > avoid "+1"-type responses. > > > > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-rtgwg-mrt-frr-architecture > > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-rtgwg-mrt-frr-algorithm > > > > > > I want to formally ask the authors (no additional contributors are listed > in the latest version of either document) to please respond to this message > indicating whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR, beyond what > has already been disclosed. The drafts will not progress (pending the > results of the WGLC) until an explicit response from each author has been > received. Please be specific as to which draft you are referring to. > > > > Currently, only draft-ietf-rtgwg-mrt-frr-architecture has any disclosed > IPR: > > > > > http://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/search/?submit=draft&id=draft-ietf-rtgwg-mrt-frr-architecture > > http://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/1594/ > > http://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/1733/ > > http://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/1801/ > > > > If you are on the WG email list or attend WG meetings but are not listed > as an author or contributor, please keep in mind your obligations under the > IETF IPR rules which encourage you to notify the IETF if you are aware of > IPR of others on an IETF contribution, or to refrain from participating in > any contribution or discussion related to your undisclosed IPR. > > > > Thanks! > > > > Alvaro. > > > _______________________________________________ > rtgwg mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg > >
_______________________________________________ rtgwg mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
