Hopefully the authors will respond to my last call comments.
Also I think that Rob's characterization of the operational
issues need a response.
- Stewart
On 15/12/2015 16:07, Alvaro Retana (aretana) wrote:
Hi!
We have concluded the WGLC. There are some clarifying comments and
nits that were brought up that need to be addressed before progressing
to the next stage, including the author list in the architecture draft.
As a reminder, Janos is the Shepherd and will be assisting me in the
process as both WG Chairs and the Responsible AD for rtgwg are authors.
Thanks!
Alvaro.
On 11/12/15, 9:27 AM, "rtgwg on behalf of Alvaro Retana (aretana)"
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> on behalf of
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Fat fingered the name of one of the drafts.. :-(
In case it's not obvious, this WGLC is
for draft-ietf-rtgwg-mrt-frr-architecture *and*
draft-ietf-rtgwg-mrt-frr-algorithm.
Alvaro.
On 11/12/15, 9:22 AM, "rtgwg on behalf of Alvaro Retana (aretana)"
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> on behalf
of [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Hi!
Because both WG Chairs and the Responsible AD are directly
involved (as authors) in the MRT work, they have recused
themselves and asked me to make the WGLC and corresponding
consensus call. Janos Farkas has agreed to be the Shepherd
for both documents. I will continue to be the Responsible AD
for both. [Note that Jeff is not listed as author/contributor
on draft-ietf-rtgwg-mrt-frr-algorithm, but it only makes sense
to process the 2 documents together.]
This message starts a WGLC for
draft-rtgwg-mrt-frr-architecture *and*
draft-ietf-rtgwg-mrt-frr-algorithm. This call will close by
EOD (pick your favorite time zone) on November 30,
2015. Please provide specific feedback as to why you support
(or not) the advancement of these drafts. Please avoid
"+1"-type responses.
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-rtgwg-mrt-frr-architecture
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-rtgwg-mrt-frr-algorithm
I want to formally ask the authors (no additional contributors
are listed in the latest version of either document) to please
respond to this message indicating whether or not you are
aware of any relevant IPR, beyond what has already been
disclosed. The drafts will not progress (pending the results
of the WGLC) until an explicit response from each author has
been received. Please be specific as to which draft you are
referring to.
Currently, only draft-ietf-rtgwg-mrt-frr-architecture has any
disclosed IPR:
http://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/search/?submit=draft&id=draft-ietf-rtgwg-mrt-frr-architecture
http://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/1594/
http://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/1733/
http://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/1801/
If you are on the WG email list or attend WG meetings but are
not listed as an author or contributor, please keep in mind
your obligations under the IETF IPR rules which encourage you
to notify the IETF if you are aware of IPR of others on an
IETF contribution, or to refrain from participating in any
contribution or discussion related to your undisclosed IPR.
Thanks!
Alvaro.
_______________________________________________
rtgwg mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
--
For corporate legal information go to:
http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/index.html
_______________________________________________
rtgwg mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
