IC (MA) order is lie about absence of public interest.
Public interest are given in page 16 to 21 of appeal
Kindly note, this are full five page.In very few  cases so many public interest 
are involved.
Whereas in the appeal order, nothing is discussed in the order.
kindly see the relavant portion of appeal order.
  I  am  not  satisfied  that  the 
  disclosure of the information sought for by Shri. Rajan will serve any such 
public 
  interest.    Nothing  is  mentioned  in  his  application  how  the  
disclosure  of  the 
  information  would  serve  the  larger  public  interest.  
with regards
rakesh gupta

sroy1947 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:                             Dear Rakesh,
 
 'Hosh' not 'Josh'. P Rajan's appeals were rightly dismissed by both
 M.M.Ansari as well as A.N.Tewari later on. Only IC(PB) game him some
 "hollow" relief in Complaint. IC(PB)'s order is the most interesting.
 
 http://www.cic.gov.in/CIC-Orders/Decision_25072006_2.pdf
 http://cic.gov.in/CIC-Orders/Decision_20042007_07.pdf
 http://cic.gov.in/CIC-Orders/CIC_Order_Dtd_06032006.pdf
 
 Why did P Rajan not think of 8(1)(d). Because he is a journalist. Many
 journalists think they are God and dont have to bother with little
 things like rules and exemptions which apply to ordinary 2nd class
 people. I have always held that 8(1)(d) is one of the most powerful
 (and least understood) exemptions in RTI - which is also why wily
 Mr.Habibullah refused to pass an order when I invoked it against all
 the Mir Jafars in Narmada Dam dispute.
 
 Sarbajit
  
 --- In [email protected], RAKESH GUPTA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
 >
 > dear sirs,
 > i had already vide this forum informed about the siphoning of fund
 and tax evasion by Mathrubhumi News paper.
 > CIC had helped the newspaper by denying the information TO THE
 INFORMER .
 > Tax official had not taken action on the tax evasion petetion about
 the Mathrubhumi News paper.
 > This action of laughing at the RTI user is payment (bribe) to
 Government officers in kind to destory the RTI Act.Main suffers of
 this ACt Act is Government servant.
 > Due to this Act, they have to become from King to service provider,
 the chage role is dislike by the public servant. Becasue it has
 resulted , their illegal bribe income reduced.
 > if any one want to know more, he may inspect the records at the CIC
 > Case Ref: CIC/MA/A/2006/258.
 > The informer Mr P Rajan vide this RTI requested progress in his tax
 evasion petetions and inspection of the records.
 > 
 > with regards
 > rakesh gupta
 > 
 > colnrkurup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:                             Dear
 Mr.Manoj Pai,
 >      By now you might have received the scan of the newspaper cutting 
 >  I had sent to you. I had translated verbattum. From the responses, it 
 >  seems it did not convey what I was wanting to convey.  Incidentally I 
 >  am not the Information seeker referred in the paper. In fact I do not 
 >  know who it is. One individual from that Panchayat had tried to probe 
 >  into the affairs of the Panchayat and Mathrubhumi News paper as usual 
 >  is mocking at him instead of appreciating his job tomake his mouth 
 >  sht. Few months back the same paper had a dig when some one from 
 >  Kannur sought certin inconvenient information from the Collectorate, 
 >  Kannur.  I found that news of Mathrubhumi  had made people at Kannur 
 >  from digging further. I think you might have realised the cituation 
 >  by now.
 >  
 >  Col NR Kurup (Retd) 
 >  
 >  --- In [email protected], Manoj Pai <manojpai@> wrote:
 >  >
 >  > Hello Col Kurup & friends,
 >  > 
 >  > I have been reading the posts in this thread for a
 >  > while.  Here is a clear case of "Lost in translation".
 >  > 
 >  > What ever were the contents of the original newspaper
 >  > article, it was penned in good faith. Its just how you
 >  > read it and want to believe. 
 >  > 
 >  > Majority of the readers informed me that the article
 >  > did not contain anything adverse. It was but a kind of
 >  > awakening alarm for the residents of Kerala. 
 >  > 
 >  > Maybe Col Kurup would like to re-read the original
 >  > article a few more times to understand it message.
 >  > 
 >  > Best wishes
 >  > 
 >  > Manoj Pai
 >  > Ahmedabad
 >  > --- sroy1947 <sroy1947@> wrote:
 >  > > > Col NR Kurup <colnrkurup@> wrote:
 >  > > > 
 >  > > >           In Kerala, anything concerned with the
 >  > > Right to
 >  > > Information Act 2005
 >  > > > appears to be a taboo for the visual media. The
 >  > > news media, of
 >  > 
 >  > 
 >  > 
 >  >       
 >  __________________________________________________________
 >  ______________
 >  > Be a better friend, newshound, and 
 >  > know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile.  Try it now.  
 >  http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ
 >  >
 >  
 >  
 >      
 >                                        
 > 
 >        
 > ---------------------------------
 >  Did you know? You can CHAT without downloading messenger.  Click here
 > 
 > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
 >
 
 
     
                                       

       
---------------------------------
 Why delete messages? Unlimited storage is just a click away.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Reply via email to