Sarabjit For 3 years wajahat and tiwari have formalised corruption within C.I.C. Do not have any illusions that wajahat is cleaner than tiwari. both are equaly dirty.
Wajahat is like a Teflon, nothing sticks to him, and he is smoother in his corruption than Tiwari so people never point fingers but praise him. Wajahat is a devil who has destroy the peace process in J&K like he has destroyed RTI ACT S D Sharma --- In [email protected], "sroy1947" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Dear Group, > > We are proud to reveal that this group has gotten C'IC Wajahat > Habibullah to personally intervene and commence action on the scandal > we exposed on this group concerning Information Commissioner A.N. > Tiwari's corrupt little decisions. > > Here is our message:- > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rti_india/message/2572 > > Where we said:- > > <quote> > "In a nut-shell Mr Thakker (like scores of similar applicants) was > told that provisions in the Companies Act of 1956 OVER-RIDE those of > RTI Act 2005. > > Now the moot point is, "WHERE IS THE PREVIOUS DECISION OF ANT > AND WHY IS IT NOT ON THE CIC WEBSITE?" > > For those interested it is "K. Lall Vs. Ministry of Company Affairs; > Appeal No.CIC/AT/A/2007/00112; Date of Decision:12.4.2007." > > Well as it turns out, this "landmark" decision was WRITTEN BY the P/A > (and rubber stamped by ANT) because the bloody fool Appellant( a > serial RTIer senior citizen) failed to show up, and incidentally > raised all sorts of stupid grounds - such as "I am not interested in > receiving information but only want my queries to be answered". > CRUCIALLY, it was not delivered in "open proceedings" as required by > Rules. > > As a result, this "binding" decision of IC ANT is used by every other > IC to deny information via RTI Act - and to allow P/As to charge > whatever they want to provide information. > > These buggers are stealing the RTI Act from under our noses, what are > we going to do about it ?" > </quote> > > This expose of mine, caused general consternation, and finally > regulars at the CIC website were STUNNED to see TODAY that the > decision of IC(T) dated 12.April.2007 (Yes 2007!!) has been finally > published as a "NEW" decision of CIC so that the world can see just > how corrupt (the alternative is "Ignorant" which he is decidedly not) > IC(Tiwari) really is. > > http://cic.gov.in/cic_netizen/RecentDecisions.asp > (Right at the bottom) > > I stand by my allegation that this decision was not drafted by the > Information Commissioner himself but by the Public Authority > concerned. I can also now allege that IC(Tiwari) meets Public > Authorities in advance of hearings, accepts secret written pleadings > from them, and rides roughshod over defenceless appellants when they > appear before him with these points leaked to him in advance. It is a > fact that no other IC has received as many complaints against him as > this gentleman (with IC Ansari coming a close second) > > We hope that Mr Habibullah institutes a Vigilance Inquiry against the > all-round corruption in his Commission. If he is not prepared to, can > he publicly inform us who the Vigilance Officer of the CIC is so that > citizens can initiate the necessary proceedings. > > Sarbajit >
