Dear All,
Col Kurup has addressed this mail to some of the groups where I do no not
have access and their members may not be aware of the background.
He has raised 3 points.
1. I agree with him that no one should be rude / insolent with anyone
including in the emails.
2. Mr Shailesh Gandhi as CIC has some authority of his own. I am sure that
he has taken full care of that.
He is fully aware of OSA. There is no law to prevent employing extra hands
to complete any work in the govt. Almost every govt dept is outsourcing
their work outside. Use of computers should be encouraged and manual
intervention should be reduced.
3. His contention that he is helping PIO's is incorrect. He is using his
powers judiciously to punish the erring PIO's. As I mentioned earlier, *the
aim is to get the correct information and in time, not to collect the money
by penalties. One should not expect miracles.*
**
*I, once again, request all citizens of India to support not only Mr
Shailesh Gandhi but all such govt officials who take initiatives to improve
efficiency in their work / dept.*
**
*Incidently, I have never known Mr Gandhi and heard him first time on 8 Mar,
2009 at Mumbai at a RTI meet.*
regards
Col Shivraj


On 3/10/09, Col NR Kurup <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>   I beg your pardon. Nothing is right in what Mr.Shailesh Gandhi has done.
> Let me list out some of them as follows:
>
> 1. Whatever may be the reason he should not have allowed his staff to
> ill-treat Mr.S Roy an Rtian known to Shailesh Gandhi also as such since
> long
>
> 2. It is highly irregular to employ non-government servants viz., those
> whose antecedents not verified and accepted by the competent authority in
> government office. The rule does not permit as thereby he is giving access
> to the documents of CIC to persons not accepted by government. This is
> stretching Official Secrets Act too much.. Mind you that the OSA is still
> not abrogated.
>
> 3. His above action is not for the good of RTI Act; but for the good of
> PIOs
> whom he is unlawfully pardoning. Can anyone say what good his actions has
> done to the RTI.? Our aim is to create a cituation where no PIO should dare
> to deny an information without any reasonable cause. With Mr.Shailesh
> Gandhys style of functioning every PIOs have the courage to shoo away the
> applicants telling them to go to the CIC fully knwoing that thereby he is
> defenitely getting more than 180 days instead of 30 days. Is it good for
> the RTI Act.? Is it what we all are visualising. Defenitely not me.
>
> I think that we should finish this Shailesh Gandhi topice for ever
> ccconsidering also one of the inconvenient ICs if he is not prepared to
> behave like an Rtians as he used tobe before achieving what he might be
> dreaming for.
>
> 4.
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
> 
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Reply via email to