Hi, Thanks for all the flak.
> I would say now Roland is trying to build RTnet against some split-up > kernel tree where sources and binaries sit in different directories. > Roland, can you confirm this? That should not work with RTnet's build > system (no one felt the need to support this yet), while Xenomai is fine > as it is built together with the main tree. I wish this were the case but I cannot confirm it. I only have 4 machines running linux and they all seem to have the same structure of kernel source in /usr/src/linux-version and the binaries under /lib/.... The other distros I run are Suse 8.2, 9.2 and some embedded variant. I have not tried to patch them with xenomai and rtnet so cannot tell if they give the same behaviour.....I am probably not familiar enough with linux to understand exactly what is meant by the split in src and binary and how that should differ from what I have on my machines. Perhaps there are kernel binaries stored in other places i do not know of or amongst the kernel src which is not taking place on this slackware variant of mine. I have tried another 2.6.16 kernel src package on this slackware distribution, exactly the same result. I have done make bzimage make modules make modules_install the latter to sync the modules and the src tree and then tried it. No luck. I have no evidence that there is anything strange about my kernel source directory other than that rtnet takes a nose dive on it. What binaries is it looking for that do not get generated and put in the correct place by the above mentioned make process? Also does the build process of rtnet need any binaries? Please, I repeat my request. Tell me the exact 2.6.16 kernel src package to download (to be sure preferably exactly where to down-load it). I will then use that package and see what it does. Correct me if I am wrong: If I take a vanilla kernel src and set this up under /usr/src/linux-2.6.16 subsequently patch this kernel with xenomai and build it with my current config file. If I then run the rtnet build process on it, I should come right? In fact, after patching the kernel with xenomai do I need to build the kernel at all? Should not the "correct" kernel src patched with xenomai be enough to build the rtnet thingy? Appreciated, kind regards, Roland. > > Jan > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ _______________________________________________ RTnet-users mailing list RTnet-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rtnet-users
