--- In [email protected], "ed_loizeaux" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>the immense size of structures
> in O scale. But I could be wrong about that -- the reverse
> defection, that is. Nothing wrong about the statement regarding HUGE
> O scale structures.
>
Hi Ed, Nope, I've always said we only need too scales, S for the
big stuff and TT for the small then the manufacturers could all
concentrate on the two sizes and we'd have lots of stuff( then we'd
have no excuses for not building that layout) I've found O is too big
and N is too small but my two favs are perfect...dave
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/S-Scale/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/S-Scale/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
