All --

Two things:

1.  The proposed S scale e-zine website.  I am opposed to this idea.  Reason is 
that only about half of us do e-mail.  The entire S scale fraternity deserves a 
publication, not just us "techies."

2.  1:64 Modeling Guide.  The reasons 1:64MG is tanking are not simply the 
health and the other businesses of Brother Bendever.  It is because of a series 
of judgment lapses on the part of Dr. Ben.  Firstly, he changed the name of his 
well-respected magazine from "S/Sn3" to "1:64," and promptly lost most of his 
Sn3 subscribers.  He had lost sight of the value of the name he bought.  Then 
he made it known that he intended to sweep in vehicles, boats, and airplanes, 
figuring that he'd get a lot more readers.  But he forgot that the S scaler is 
committed (as the pig is regarding breakfast) -- Our entire layout  must be 
1:64 scale, whereas the vehicle modeler is merely involved (like the chicken re 
breakfast) because he doesn't need to do all his modeling in the same scale.  
So he lost more railroaders.  Then he told all his readers that he doesn't know 
much about model railroading.  Whether true or not, this is not the way to 
generate confidence.  Finally,
 he told his readers that they needed to support him or he would fail.  When 
you actually print this sort of statement, it generally becomes a 
self-fulfilling prophecy.

Ben is not article-shy, at least from me.  He is sitting on several as-yet 
uncommitted articles.  Based on his now publicized effort to shed the magazine, 
I have asked for my unpublished articles to be returned.

Personally, I like Ben, and I had made it one of my missions to help him 
succeed, despite the fact that he and I had different ideas on what should be 
said and done.  I had advised him regarding every one of the episodes recounted 
above, but he had gone his own way anyway.  Sometimes I thought he asked me 
just so he could figure out what the exact opposite ought to be.

So why have I told you all of this "inside info?"  Well, it's because there's a 
lot more to this story than the seemingly simple explanation that S scalers 
can't support a magazine.  Maybe we can and maybe we can't, but Ben's mag is 
not an appropriate test case.  Now that he's folding, anyone interested in 
taking up the challenge needs to know why he failed.

Dick Karnes




      
____________________________________________________________________________________
Be a better friend, newshound, and 
know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile.  Try it now.  
http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ 


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/S-Scale/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/S-Scale/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

Reply via email to