I cannot remember just what trucks were used with the CD model kits (my first 
venturento S). When the Culp  (Northeastern) came along we thougt we were in 
heaven.  They had more detail than any HO  (especialy those Megow lumps).  The 
Carl Auell O gauge trucks were exceptional, and EXPENSIVE.

  I recall Graceline trucks in O  Were those thw Auell. Walthers had those 
heavy diecast (in his monotype units.  M Dale Newton used printing equipment 
for his castings.   Each gauge had their varieties.  And everyone wanted models 
of every type of truck out there.                                               
              
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: JGG KahnSr 
  To: [email protected] 
  Sent: Friday, December 17, 2010 11:46 AM
  Subject: RE: {S-Scale List} Northeastern Trucks


    

  Perhaps because in their heyday they were pretty much the only game in town; 
they were nicely sprung back when most of us
  model railroaders preferred sprung trucks to older clunky equalized-only ones 
(and I don't intend to get into a discussion about
  whether sprung car trucks really add anything to operation). I picked up a 
pair of the Rex trucks from an estate Don Heimburger
  was disposing of at Duluth, just for nostalgia; they seem all right, but I 
shan't regret never getting any more of them. I'd guess
  years ago those were the only alternatives--until the Ace trucks 
appeared--for scale S trucks.

  From recurring discussions over the years, zamac crumbling apparently comes 
from dies contaminated with lead in casting, usually
  because the manufacturer was re-using zamac scrap--a false economy. I have 
Auel castings in O scale that are older than I am, from
  the 1930's, that are still sound with no evidence of decay.

  The SHS trucks are entirely satisfactory--perhaps because of the celcon 
inserts in the metal sideframes--and I understand the rationale for the 
double-insulated wheelsets, although longstanding prejudice still prefers 
one-side only. My only reservation is that the prototype pattern is not the 
most common "Bettendorf" but more the primary PRR kind. I've discovered that 
earlier SHS trucks tend to bow in and need a spring plank added; later design 
corrected this. Perhaps the Andrews leaf spring trucks I found are some of 
Don's pre-SHS offerings.

  Jace Kahn

  General Manager 
  Ceres & Canisteo RR Co./Champlain County Traction Co.

  > At one time I would say that the NE trucks were the most popular in S 
  > scale. But I think their time has passed some years ago. I bought my 
  > first pair back in about 62 so that makes them nearly 50 years old. 
  > This brings up an interesting point in that I've never heard of them 
  > crumbling like our Alco Models gear boxes or Enhorning passenger car 
  > trucks, so whoever actually made the castings used a good clean mix of 
  > product.
  > Probably the best rolling and detailed trucks made in metal are the SHS 
trucks. In plastic we have AM, DesPlains and the former Pacific Rail who all 
make several versions. I don't think even the Ace trucks are ever going to be 
remade except for the RB versions. All these trucks rolled better than the 
NE/Kinsman trucks and look just as good.
  > 
  > If I'm not mistaken Don Thompson's Trainstuff made copies of the NE 
  > trucks for awhile.
  > 
  > Bob Werre



  [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



  

  __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature 
database 5711 (20101217) __________

  The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

  http://www.eset.com


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/S-Scale/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/S-Scale/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected] 
    [email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to