Being retired ( and not over the hill) you could very well afford to do all the 
necessary testing for free on your big layout. 
 And being in California would make it convenient to the container ports..

John Armstrong
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Ed 
  To: [email protected] 
  Sent: Friday, February 04, 2011 2:23 PM
  Subject: {S-Scale List} Quality Problems......


    
  > While there's enough blame to go around, most of
  > the soaring electronic failure rate experienced 
  > over the last decade is the responsibility of the 
  > Taiwanese.
  > Stan
  > Stokrocki

  In my opinion, the firm making the bad parts is only partially to blame. Most 
of the blame should be heaped upon the maker/importer of the final product for 
not having an incoming receiving inspection process. Yes, it costs money to 
hire inspectors and provide them with test equipment. Then again, there are 
outside laboratories that can be contracted to do testing of the complex parts. 

  Merely assuming that all parts coming in the back door are working and built 
properly is like a time bomb waiting to go off. Sooner or later it will bite 
you. Likewise, sending completed products out the front door without a thorough 
final test/inspection is the same as telling your customers to do the 
inspection that you should have done yourself.

  Would airlines purchase Boeing airplanes if the planes were not tested and 
inspected thoroughly? I wonder how much Boeing spends on QC -- both incoming 
and final -- as a percentage of the cost of an airplane? I wonder if Gary 
Chudzinski would have willingly paid an extra $15 for an HO mass-produced 
engine without any problems at all? I bet he would, but he can answer for 
himself.

  To add a bit of S scale model railroading to this message, even the best of S 
importers/manufacturers do not do thorough testing. Some do not test at all, 
but just send the box off to the customer after it clears customs from the 
orient. Others do a test run on a short section of straight track and do fix 
the obvious defects. Nobody actually runs each and every loco around a curve or 
up a grade before shipping to a customer. Curves and grades are where many 
problems surface because the pilot truck, trailing truck, wheelsets, couplers, 
etc. all shift sideways and up&down and touch things they should not be 
touching. Pulling a long train up a grade would quickly expose wimpy u-joints 
and rubber tubing slippage and the like.

  We, the model railroading consumer, have been brainwashed to believe that we 
are not willing to pay for tested and inspected merchandise. If Gary will pay 
extra for a good loco, so will I !! I just wish every loco ran as well as the 
UP turbine that performs during my open houses. That is on heckuva piece of 
industrial machinery.

  By the way, the "S"acto convention will have a clinic on how to make engines 
run better. Is that a sign of the times or what?

  Cheers...Ed L.



  

  __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature 
database 5747 (20101230) __________

  The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

  http://www.eset.com



__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature 
database 5747 (20101230) __________

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/S-Scale/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/S-Scale/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected] 
    [email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to