I also play with 1:1 scale........ (which I should be doing now, instead of 
'S'urfing!)

--- In [email protected], "pickycat95" <pickycat95@...> wrote:
>
> Now if I think about it...
> 
> tan(1/9) = 6.34 degress and tan(1/18) + tan(1/18)= 6.36 degrees for those who 
> aren't surveyors. That means the divergence ratio is 1:8.97 
> 
> Hmmm... 0.2 degrees and .03 sure slices the baloney thin at 3/16" scale.  I'm 
> sticking with 1/N where N is the number turnout for my divergence ratio.
> 
> At 1:1 scale this could become quite serious.
> Ben Trousdale
> 
> --- In [email protected], "Gavin" <csowry@> wrote:
> >
> > It is.
> > 
> > A #9 frog is 6deg 22min 02sec.
> > A 1 in 9 is 6deg 20min 25sec.
> > 
> > --- In [email protected], "Gavin" <csowry@> wrote:
> > >
> > > ..or is it 2 (tan 1/12 + tan 1/12), must look up the ARA specs.
> > > 
> > > --- In [email protected], "Gavin" <csowry@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > The British actually use 'straight' frogs, just like in USA, and here 
> > > > in NZ. It is the Germans, and some other European railways that use 
> > > > curved frogs.
> > > > 
> > > > There is a difference between British/NZ and USA in measuring the frog. 
> > > > The geometric angle of a US #6 frog, say, is not the same as a British 
> > > > 1 in 6 frog. 
> > > > 
> > > > Off the top of my head, the British formula is tan 1/6, whereas the 
> > > > American is 2 tan (1/12 + 1/12).
> > > > 
> > > > --- In [email protected], "Ed" <Loizeaux@> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Only "toy trains" have a curved frog.
> > > > > > AbBaird
> > > > > 
> > > > > As a general statement for American railroading that is true.  
> > > > > However, in England most real turnouts are made with a curved frog.  
> > > > > My NYC-themed layout has almost all curved frogs (and curved adjacent 
> > > > > rails) because I use White Oak Models turnouts sold by Kelvin White 
> > > > > who lived in Oxford at the time.  Even though they are technically 
> > > > > incorrect for the NYC and other American railroads, I like them 
> > > > > because the longer continuous curve equates to a much larger "real" 
> > > > > radius than the typical American design with straight points/curved 
> > > > > closure rail/stright frog/curved rail past the frog.  Thus, I find it 
> > > > > much easier to ease the 4-8-4 Niagara and other 8-coupled wheeled 
> > > > > steamers through a #6 turnout in the yards.  Ken Reiter's SP 2-10-4 
> > > > > also goes through a #6 turnout of this type easily.  Yep, bending the 
> > > > > rule once in a while pays off.  Cheers....Ed L.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>




------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/S-Scale/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/S-Scale/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected] 
    [email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to