Funny... but t he problem with the term "Gaugian" is that it does not necessarily mean one is modeling in S "SCALE." A 'gaugian' could be modeling in a smaller scale with wider-gauged track that is appropriate for S scale, or a larger scale with narrower-gauged track that is appropriate for S scale .
Maybe I'm wrong... but I thought we were trying to promote the size of our models, not the width of our track. Oh well... whatever. My other point about divisions being not enough still stands. John Degnan [email protected] ----- Original Message ----- From: "Roy" <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Wednesday, November 16, 2011 11:56:07 AM Subject: {S-Scale List} What's in a name? was Re: New NASG Website? No, new NAME!!! The coolest name change had to be the one someone suggested once. Change the S-Gaugian to the S-Scalian. Roy [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] ------------------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/S-Scale/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/S-Scale/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: [email protected] [email protected] <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [email protected] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
