I stand corrected, but I have yet to find anyone is S trying it. It looks smaller than the #5 coupler head--can't win for losing. DJE
----- Original Message ----- From: John Degnan To: [email protected] Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2011 5:25 PM Subject: Re: {S-Scale List} Re: Kadee 802/808's vs any "HO" coupler What... you mean this one? : http://www.kadee.com/htmbord/page118.htm Looks to be still in production to me. John Degnan [email protected] ----- Original Message ----- From: David Engle To: [email protected] Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2011 09:36 AM Subject: Re: {S-Scale List} Re: Kadee 802/808's vs any "HO" coupler The only thing I can think of is you have to have decent vertical easements to keep separation down to a minimum. I even have a couple longer engines and cars equipped with the 118 tightlock couplers, but I understand they are no longer making it, and it has its swing restrictions. DJE [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] ------------------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/S-Scale/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/S-Scale/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: [email protected] [email protected] <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [email protected] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
