I probably assumed too much. But it felt wrong to say
“there is a problem building ntl but ntl upstream is happy
to talk to you about your needs” (and doing that anonymously
feels like a prank call).
I prefer the mailing list option and I am actually subscribed.
Still have to get to it.
> On 18/10/2016, at 22:27, 'Bill Hart' via sage-devel
> <email@example.com> wrote:
> Are you sure you need an account on the trac to report it? The http version
> at least seems to accept essentially anonymous input.
> Alternatively, I guess JP's suggestion should work fine. It might be even
> better if some discussion is needed about what interface NTL should provide.
> On Tuesday, 18 October 2016 08:52:23 UTC+2, François wrote:
> > On 18/10/2016, at 19:42, Jean-Pierre Flori <jpf...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Tuesday, October 18, 2016 at 6:37:49 AM UTC+2, Victor Shoup wrote:
> > Good! But it should be determined if there is an interface that ntl could
> > provide so that this problem goes away
> > I think that what you suggested: extracting gmp bignums from NTL's ZZ (and
> > the other way around) would be great.
> Who is doing the reporting to singular upstream? Preferably someone
> who already has an account on singular’s trac.
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "sage-devel" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To post to this group, send email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
To post to this group, send email to email@example.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.