#5249: [with patch, needs work] implicit_plot3d functionality (isosurfaces, 3d
contour plots, etc.)
-------------------------+--------------------------------------------------
 Reporter:  jason        |       Owner:  was       
     Type:  enhancement  |      Status:  new       
 Priority:  major        |   Milestone:  sage-3.4.1
Component:  graphics     |    Keywords:            
-------------------------+--------------------------------------------------

Comment(by wcauchois):

 Hi, I just started working on this issue!

 One thing I noticed is that the automated testing framework tests
 instances of Graphics3d by invoking the obj() method, which returns a
 representation in Wavefront OBJ format -- however, ImplicitSurface does
 not support this feature yet. So do you think we should add this feature
 (presumably by building off of MarchingCubesTachyon)? Or should we, for
 example, invoke export_jmol() inside of a stub obj_repr() method just to
 make the automated tests actually test something?

 I've attached a patch with some minor fixes which ensures the code will
 build and pass the doctests trivially -- obj_repr() is defined to return
 the empty string, for now.

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/5249#comment:7>
Sage <http://sagemath.org/>
Sage - Open Source Mathematical Software: Building the Car Instead of 
Reinventing the Wheel

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to