#5249: [with patch, needs work] implicit_plot3d functionality (isosurfaces, 3d
contour plots, etc.)
-------------------------+--------------------------------------------------
Reporter: jason | Owner: was
Type: enhancement | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-3.4.2
Component: graphics | Keywords:
-------------------------+--------------------------------------------------
Comment(by wcauchois):
I updated trac5249.patch. Apply it on top of implicit-surfaces.patch.
I added 28 examples to the docstring for implicit_plot3d. I also attached
many-more-examples.tar, which contains a simple script I used to format
the examples. It can output the examples in a Sage notebook format, so if
you want to see the examples, you should check it out.
Jason: Here's the status. I've done much of the work that Carl described
in his original email. Currently, the major thing left to do is fixing
bugs.
Aside from the two bugs Carl mentioned, which are still outstanding, there
is one critical bug that I discovered. If you specify different X, Y or Z
ranges, then Jmol rendering is radically wrong (although Tachyon is
unaffected). For example, try this:
{{{
var('x,y,z')
implicit_plot3d(x^2+y^2+z^2-4,(-2,0),(-2,2),(-2,2)).show(viewer='jmol')
}}}
Good luck, I hope you can make some headway!
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/5249#comment:13>
Sage <http://sagemath.org/>
Sage - Open Source Mathematical Software: Building the Car Instead of
Reinventing the Wheel
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
