#5093: [with patch, needs review] rewrite fast_float to support more datatypes
------------------------------+---------------------------------------------
 Reporter:  cwitty            |       Owner:  cwitty    
     Type:  enhancement       |      Status:  assigned  
 Priority:  major             |   Milestone:  sage-3.4.2
Component:  basic arithmetic  |    Keywords:            
------------------------------+---------------------------------------------

Comment(by cwitty):

 ''Something else that would be really nice is an option that uses a fast
 domain, if it's there, but ignores the domain parameter if it's not.''

 Any suggestions for syntax for this?  I'm coming up with things like (...,
 domain=RIF, ignore_domain_if_no_specialized_interpreter_exists=True),
 which seems cumbersome :) (I'm probably being too picky about being
 precise in my parameter names).

 I've vaguely planned to use _xxx_ arithmetic, but didn't do it for this
 version because I don't know how to call Cython methods from C.  Help
 would be appreciated :)

 The type(x)==type(generic_element) is a good idea.  I'll implement it
 eventually.  (Then if I could access the _parent field from C, probably
 almost all of the element interpreter slowdown would be gone; in
 conjunction with _xxx_ arithmetic, it might actually be faster than the
 generic Python interpreter.)

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/5093#comment:21>
Sage <http://sagemath.org/>
Sage - Open Source Mathematical Software: Building the Car Instead of 
Reinventing the Wheel

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to