#13137: upgrade MPIR to 2.6.0
-------------------------------------------------------------------------+--
Reporter: jhpalmieri |
Owner: tbd
Type: enhancement |
Status: needs_review
Priority: major |
Milestone: sage-5.6
Component: packages |
Resolution:
Keywords: mpir spkg |
Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A |
Reviewers: Jeroen Demeyer
Authors: John Palmieri, Jean-Pierre Flori, Karl-Dieter Crisman |
Merged in:
Dependencies: #13755 |
Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------+--
Comment (by kcrisman):
Notwithstanding, Sage passes all (not long) tests even with that on my
Mac. Maybe that's good enough.
> Just FYI, it seems to me that we should quite quickly get rid of zn_poly
spkg.
> Not sure the spkg will be used at all when FLINT gets updated to 2.3,
see #12173 which is definitely more than ready for review.
I don't notice any talk there about getting rid of it, though I see the
name changes. That said, there are only three files in `module_list.py`
which include `zn_poly` in their library list, and then there is the whole
sage/schemes/hyperelliptic_curves/hypellfrob/ folder, also by David
Harvey. It does appear that "zn_poly is no longer maintained" and the
latest version is included in FLINT - has been since 2009, huh.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/13137#comment:61>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
