#13137: upgrade MPIR to 2.6.0
-------------------------------------------------------------------------+--
Reporter: jhpalmieri |
Owner: tbd
Type: enhancement |
Status: needs_review
Priority: major |
Milestone: sage-5.6
Component: packages |
Resolution:
Keywords: mpir spkg |
Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A |
Reviewers: Jeroen Demeyer
Authors: John Palmieri, Jean-Pierre Flori, Karl-Dieter Crisman |
Merged in:
Dependencies: #13755 |
Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------+--
Comment (by jpflori):
Replying to [comment:61 kcrisman]:
> Notwithstanding, Sage passes all (not long) tests even with that on my
Mac, as well as on sage.math. Maybe that's good enough for this ticket.
>
> ----
>
> > Just FYI, it seems to me that we should quite quickly get rid of
zn_poly spkg.
> > Not sure the spkg will be used at all when FLINT gets updated to 2.3,
see #12173 which is definitely more than ready for review.
> I don't notice any talk there about getting rid of it, though I see the
name changes. That said, there are only three files in `module_list.py`
which include `zn_poly` in their library list, and then
For the first file, linking to zn_poly should not be needed anymore and
should be fixed at #12173.
In fact I'm not really sure anyway it was, there is no direct reference to
zn_poly there and it must in fact use it through FLINT 1.5.2 (which ships
zn_poly...).
For the second file, the sole function which still really directly use is
some "experimental preview"...
The real deal is operated through FLINT (which then use its own zn_poly).
I think this should be removed as well and the preview function deleted (I
don't think it used anywhere).
> there is the whole sage/schemes/hyperelliptic_curves/hypellfrob/ folder,
also by David Harvey, which definitely depends on it. It does appear that
"zn_poly is no longer maintained" and the latest version was included in
FLINT - has been since 2009, huh. I assume its functionality is still in
the "complete rewrite" of FLINT 2.x?
Indeed the hypellfrob spkg will still depend on zn_poly.
Although I think all functionalities of zn_poly should be given by FLINT
2.3 (and even 1.5.2 which ships zn_poly remember).
This is more problematic as we would need to patch hyperellfrob to use
what is exposed by FLINT 1.5.2 or rather 2.3...
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/13137#comment:71>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
