#6743: cygwin metaticket: port Sage to Microsoft Windows (via Cygwin): stage 1
--
make building Sage automatic
-------------------------------+--------------------------------------------
Reporter: was | Owner: was
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-5.8
Component: cygwin | Resolution:
Keywords: sd31 sd32 | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Reviewers: Jean-Pierre Flori, Dmitrii
Pasechnik, Karl-Dieter Crisman, Mike Hansen, William Stein, Luis Tabera
Authors: | Merged in:
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------+--------------------------------------------
Comment (by kcrisman):
> Another question: will #12415 make all doctesting on Cygwin hopeless,
given the problems with forking?
Though I should say that on my current box, it's hopeless anyway; so many
tests fail with something related to rebasing or forking or an inability
to start gap or pari or maxima (or, currently, the lack of matplotlib).
There are one or two actually interesting tests I observe, randomly. Like
{{{
File ... exp_integral.py, line 585
sage: N(f.integrate(x,2.0,3.0))
Expected:
0.6016...587
Got:
0.6016...588
}}}
But in general it's a mess when other programs are called.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/6743#comment:184>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
