#14826: Newton polygons
-----------------------------------+---------------------------
Reporter: caruso | Owner: roed
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_info
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-5.12
Component: padics | Resolution:
Keywords: Newton polygons | Merged in:
Authors: Xavier Caruso | Reviewers:
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues:
Branch: | Dependencies:
Stopgaps: |
-----------------------------------+---------------------------
Comment (by caruso):
Replying to [comment:13 vbraun]:
> Is `sage/categories/polyhedra.py` appropriate?
I tried this. But the test fails because the elements (which are instances
of `NewtonPolygon_element`) are not instances of `PolyhedralSets` and I do
not really want to derive from this class.
> If not, skip the categories test.
I can skip the category test, but it is also included in the elements
tests. So, should I skip both?
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/14826#comment:14>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
