#14826: Newton polygons
-----------------------------------+---------------------------
Reporter: caruso | Owner: roed
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_info
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-5.12
Component: padics | Resolution:
Keywords: Newton polygons | Merged in:
Authors: Xavier Caruso | Reviewers:
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues:
Branch: | Dependencies:
Stopgaps: |
-----------------------------------+---------------------------
Comment (by caruso):
Replying to [comment:15 vbraun]:
> Since you are deriving from !RingElement your category should probably
be `Rings`. Does that work?
It should. Nevertheless, I just realized that the set of Newton polygons
is not a ring but just a semiring (there is no additive inverse).
The category of semirings exists in sage (it seems that it is only used
for the parent `NN`) but there is apparently no generic class for elements
in semirings. So, I don't know what I am supposed to do:
- should I implement a generic class for element in semirings (in
`sage.structure.elements`)
- can I derive my class from `RingElement` and raise an error in the
`_neg_` function?
- something else...
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/14826#comment:16>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
