#10963: More functorial constructions
-------------------------------------------------+-------------------------
Reporter: nthiery | Owner: stumpc5
Type: enhancement | Status:
Priority: major | needs_review
Component: categories | Milestone:
Keywords: | Resolution:
Authors: Nicolas M. ThiƩry | Merged in:
Report Upstream: N/A | Reviewers: Simon
Branch: | King
Dependencies: #11224, #8327, #10193, | Work issues:
#12895, #14516, #14722, #13589, #14471, | Commit:
#15069, #15094, #11688 | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------------------+-------------------------
Comment (by chapoton):
Hello,
here is a patch correcting the failing doctests. Nicolas, could you please
check that I have not made a mistake ? and maybe qfold if you want ?
I have been forced to remove (or rather disconnect) the example of graded
module with basis. But this can wait for another ticket.
There remains a strange failing doctest in
sagenb.notebook.interact.list_of_first_n. I am not able to solve that.
Could somebody else help ?
apply trac_10963-more_functorial_constructions-nt.patch
trac_10963_doctest_correction-fc.patch
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/10963#comment:116>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.