#14304: New implementation of unramified p-adics using FLINT and templates
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
       Reporter:  roed               |        Owner:  roed
           Type:  enhancement        |       Status:  needs_review
       Priority:  major              |    Milestone:  sage-6.1
      Component:  padics             |   Resolution:
       Keywords:                     |    Merged in:
        Authors:  Julian Rueth,      |    Reviewers:  David Roe, Julian
  David Roe                          |  Rueth
Report Upstream:  N/A                |  Work issues:
         Branch:                     |       Commit:
  u/roed/ticket/14304                |  c647f4a1413547a47196f77acade2d7c45b46c28
   Dependencies:  #12555, #12173     |     Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------

Comment (by jpflori):

 Replying to [comment:25 roed]:
 > What about things like `mpz_clear`, `fmpz_clear` and `fmpz_poly_clear`?
 If `a` is an `fmpz_poly_t` that has not yet had `fmpz_poly_init(a)` run on
 it, won't `fmpz_poly_clear(a)` be a double free?
 Yes, they will and Sage will crash, or at least could.
 On Linux you can set _MALLOC_CHECK=3 to ensure (or have a higher
 probability) it will crash in such cases.

--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/14304#comment:27>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to