#16332: Game Theory: Build capacity to calculate Shapley value of cooperative
games.
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
       Reporter:  vinceknight        |        Owner:
           Type:  enhancement        |       Status:  needs_review
       Priority:  major              |    Milestone:  sage-6.3
      Component:  finance            |   Resolution:
       Keywords:  Game Theory,       |    Merged in:
  Cooperative Games                  |    Reviewers:  Karl-Dieter Crisman,
        Authors:  James Campbell,    |  Travis Scrimshaw
  Vince Knight                       |  Work issues:
Report Upstream:  N/A                |       Commit:
         Branch:                     |  e989e841387eba59b132e21ce694442af5ef26db
  public/game_theory/Shapley_value_coop_games-16332|     Stopgaps:
   Dependencies:                     |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------

Comment (by vinceknight):

 Replying to [comment:28 tscrim]:
 > Minor point, but we adopt the (pseudo) standard of having docstring
 lines being 80 (well 79) characters long. Other than that, if you think
 the docs are good, then I think we can set this to positive review.

 I was actually aware of this but my mistake if I missed some (apologies!).
 Has anyone written a script that checks the pep8-ish convention? That
 would be cool...

 To clarify: is there anything else that James and I should/can do for this
 ticket at this point? (Not sure if flicking the switch to positive review
 is for us to do?).

 >
 > Also I set this as finance since that is the closest component that game
 theory is connected too (in my somewhat uninitiated opinion, at least
 until someone adds a game theory tag <hint hint>).

 Great, thanks: how does one go about getting another tag included? It
 might make more sense once we have pushed our work for ticket 16333
 (there's a bunch of cool stuff for normal form games coming there).

 Thanks again both for your help. Really appreciative.

--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/16332#comment:29>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to