#16332: Game Theory: Build capacity to calculate Shapley value of cooperative
games.
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
       Reporter:  vinceknight        |        Owner:
           Type:  enhancement        |       Status:  needs_review
       Priority:  major              |    Milestone:  sage-6.3
      Component:  game theory        |   Resolution:
       Keywords:  Game Theory,       |    Merged in:
  Cooperative Games                  |    Reviewers:  Karl-Dieter Crisman,
        Authors:  James Campbell,    |  Travis Scrimshaw
  Vince Knight                       |  Work issues:
Report Upstream:  N/A                |       Commit:
         Branch:                     |  e989e841387eba59b132e21ce694442af5ef26db
  public/game_theory/Shapley_value_coop_games-16332|     Stopgaps:
   Dependencies:                     |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------

Comment (by tscrim):

 Replying to [comment:29 vinceknight]:
 > Replying to [comment:28 tscrim]:
 > > Minor point, but we adopt the (pseudo) standard of having docstring
 lines being 80 (well 79) characters long. Other than that, if you think
 the docs are good, then I think we can set this to positive review.
 >
 > I was actually aware of this but my mistake if I missed some
 (apologies!). Has anyone written a script that checks the pep8-ish
 convention? That would be cool...

 I don't know of any such tool, but I'd guess they are surely out there...

 > To clarify: is there anything else that James and I should/can do for
 this ticket at this point? (Not sure if flicking the switch to positive
 review is for us to do?).

 Make sure my changes are good, and if so, then you can set a positive
 review.

 > > Also I set this as finance since that is the closest component that
 game theory is connected too (in my somewhat uninitiated opinion, at least
 until someone adds a game theory tag <hint hint>).
 >
 > Great, thanks: how does one go about getting another tag included?

 Yay, new tag. Karl-Dieter, are you going to tell us how you do your magic?
 :P

--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/16332#comment:32>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to