#17034: New user interface for orthogonal arrays and a .explain_construction
method
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: ncohen | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_work
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.4
Component: combinatorial | Resolution:
designs | Merged in:
Keywords: | Reviewers:
Authors: Nathann Cohen | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Commit:
Branch: u/ncohen/17034 | 60911298a7c3bd33e4f9b7e73de61acc70dfd445
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Changes (by vdelecroix):
* status: needs_review => needs_work
Comment:
Hello,
I like much better the interface now!
In `OA_build` the argument `resolvable` is not used (and not tested).
Why do you still allow `k=None` in the function `orthogonal_array`? It
would be simpler/cleaner if it was only managed by `largest_available`.
No?
Vincent
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/17034#comment:4>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
