#17034: New user interface for orthogonal arrays and a .explain_construction 
method
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
       Reporter:  ncohen             |        Owner:
           Type:  enhancement        |       Status:  needs_work
       Priority:  major              |    Milestone:  sage-6.4
      Component:  combinatorial      |   Resolution:
  designs                            |    Merged in:
       Keywords:                     |    Reviewers:
        Authors:  Nathann Cohen      |  Work issues:
Report Upstream:  N/A                |       Commit:
         Branch:  u/ncohen/17034     |  60911298a7c3bd33e4f9b7e73de61acc70dfd445
   Dependencies:                     |     Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------

Comment (by ncohen):

 Yo !

 > I like much better the interface now!

 Well, I have a lot of things to write when this will be reviewed. Like the
 functions to get all n such that there exists an `OA(k,n)`, and stuff for
 incomplete orthogonal arrays too that I need for yet other applications of
 the Brouwer van Rees construction.

 All the stuff that I cannot write when everything is done through the same
 function.

 > In `OA_build` the argument `resolvable` is not used (and not tested).

 Oh. Right. That's because I had created a "build_resolvable" function at
 some point in the interface, and did not add it in the end.

 > Why do you still allow `k=None` in the function `orthogonal_array`? It
 would be simpler/cleaner if it was only managed by `largest_available`.
 No?

 It depends on you. I hate the very principle of backward compatibility,
 but that's why it is there, because the guys who call
 `designs.orthogonal_array` and will persist in doing so for a year even if
 it displays a warning need to be able to call it anyway, or so I am told.

 When this thing will not be deprecated anymore this will only be internal
 code and we will be allowed to remove whatever we want whenever we want.

 Nathann

--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/17034#comment:5>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to