#17034: New user interface for orthogonal arrays and a .explain_construction
method
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: ncohen | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_work
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.4
Component: combinatorial | Resolution:
designs | Merged in:
Keywords: | Reviewers:
Authors: Nathann Cohen | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Commit:
Branch: u/ncohen/17034 | e37125b68b03058d52b44404b400af9865886ff1
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by vdelecroix):
Hi,
I pushed a commit at `u/vdelecroix/17034`. With your version we add a very
ugly documentation for
{{{
sage: designs.orthogonal_arrays?
}}}
I moved the examples from the function `orthogonal_array` to the class
used for the tab completion.
I also renamed `OATabThing` into `OAMainFunctions`... it is much more
explicit.
Beyond my modifications:
- why do we have `designs.orthogonal_arrays.build` but
`designs.orthogonal_arrays.exists`. It should be uniform for the
presence/absence of `s`.
- having a class `OATabThing` to imitate a module is really ugly...
wouldn't it be better to create a new file `orthogonal_arrays_catalog.py`
which would gather the things.
- you wrote that you would like to remove the argument `existence` from
the function `orthogonal_array`... but I really do not see how we can
achieve that right now without duplication!
Vincent
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/17034#comment:9>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
