#17034: New user interface for orthogonal arrays and a .explain_construction
method
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: ncohen | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: positive_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.4
Component: combinatorial | Resolution:
designs | Merged in:
Keywords: | Reviewers: Vincent Delecroix
Authors: Nathann Cohen | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Commit:
Branch: public/17034 | b0467933bee693c0a71a83cba53af049abb0c23c
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by jdemeyer):
Replying to [comment:24 ncohen]:
> We added that when we noticed that some of our code was calling this
function with negative values, while we *KNEW* that it had to be `>=0`
The usage of `assert` would indeed have been correct in the context of
"some of our code calling this function". However, since this is a public
function which can also be called directly, the use of an `assert` is
wrong.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/17034#comment:27>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
