#17034: New user interface for orthogonal arrays and a .explain_construction
method
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: ncohen | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: positive_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.4
Component: combinatorial | Resolution:
designs | Merged in:
Keywords: | Reviewers: Vincent Delecroix
Authors: Nathann Cohen | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Commit:
Branch: | c7eae7de7591d2f8f9c2f4de13396307ac210028
u/vdelecroix/17034 | Stopgaps:
Dependencies: |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Changes (by ncohen):
* status: needs_review => positive_review
* reviewer: => Vincent Delecroix
Comment:
> I am happy with the current version. The weird case of `k < t` does not
belong to that ticket. As I did the last commit I let you put to positive
review if it deserves.
Right ! `positive_review`, then. If you feel like reviewing some actual
constructions today, the Brouwer-van Rees has been updated with the
example you wanted `:-P`
Thaaaaaaaaaaaaaaanks !
Nathann
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/17034#comment:22>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.