#17034: New user interface for orthogonal arrays and a .explain_construction
method
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: ncohen | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.4
Component: combinatorial | Resolution:
designs | Merged in:
Keywords: | Reviewers:
Authors: Nathann Cohen | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Commit:
Branch: | c7eae7de7591d2f8f9c2f4de13396307ac210028
u/vdelecroix/17034 | Stopgaps:
Dependencies: |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Changes (by ncohen):
* status: needs_info => needs_review
* commit: 024f0b3bf6f01d2aa4c42151d0ea56ed7fd2fbcd =>
c7eae7de7591d2f8f9c2f4de13396307ac210028
* branch: u/ncohen/17034 => u/vdelecroix/17034
Comment:
> For the previous remark, see the commit at `u/vdelecroix/17034`.
Oh. You already implemented it. Well let's change the branch then.
> What about
> {{{
> sage: designs.orthogonal_arrays.is_available(1,2)
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> ...
> ValueError: undefined for k<t
> sage: from sage.combinat.designs.orthogonal_arrays import
is_orthogonal_array
> sage: is_orthogonal_array([[1]]*4, 1,2,2)
> True
> }}}
I believe that we should return a matrix filles with 0 when k<t.
Nathann
----
New commits:
||[http://git.sagemath.org/sage.git/commit/?id=c7eae7de7591d2f8f9c2f4de13396307ac210028
c7eae7d]||{{{trac #17034: move the user functions into
OAMainFunctions}}}||
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/17034#comment:18>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
